The worship of Gods is a thing common to all. But the
worship of Goddesses is quite uncommon. The reason is that Gods are generally unmarried
and have no wives who can be elevated to the position of Goddesses. How repugnant is the
idea of a God being married is well illustrated by the difficulties which early Christians
had in persuading the Jews to accept Jesus as the son of God. The Jews retorted saying God
is not married and how can Jesus be the son of God.
With the Hindus the position is quite otherwise. They not
only worship Gods they also worship Goddesses. This is so from the very beginning.
In the Rig-Veda several Goddesses are mentioned such as Prithvi, Adili, Diti, Nishtigri, Indrani, Prisni, Usha,
Surya, Agnayi, Varunani, Rodasi, Raka, Sinivali, Sradha, Aramati, Apsaras and Sarasvati.
Prithvi is a very ancient Aryan Goddess. She is represented
either as wife of Dyaus heaven or of Parjanya. Prithvi is an important Goddess because
she is said to be the mother of many Gods.
Aditi is chronologically one of the older Vedic Goddesses.
She is described as the mighty mother of the Gods. The Gods, Mitra, Aryaman and Varuna are her sons. To whom Aditi was married
does not appear from the Rig-Veda. We do not know much about Diti except that she is mentioned as a goddess
along with and in contrast to Aditi and that the
Daityas who were regarded in later Indian
mythology as the enemies of the Devas were her sons.
The original title of the Chapter was ' Vedic and non-
Vedic Goddesses '. From the subject dealt with in this chapter and from the concluding
para, we have placed this at Riddle No. 12 in accordance with the subject mentioned in the
Table of Contents. This is a 21-page typed copy having some modifications and also
concluding para in the handwriting of the author.—Ed.
The
goddess Nishtigri is the mother of Indra and the
goddess Indrani is the wife of Indra. Prisni is
the mother of Maruts. Usha is described as the
daughter of the sky, the sister of Bhaga and the
kinswoman of Varuna and the wife of Surya. The
goddess Surya is the daughter of Surya and the wife of the Gods Asvins or Soma.
The goddesses Agnayi,
Varunani and Rodasi are the wives of Agni, Varuna and Rudra respectively. Of the rest of the goddesses
are mere personifications of rivers or are mentioned without any details.
From this survey two things are clear. One is that a Hindu
God can enter a married state and neither the God nor his worshipper need feel any
embarrassment on account of the God acting as though he was no better than a common man.
The second is that the God's wife automatically becomes a goddess worthy of worship by the
followers of the God.
Leaving the Vedic times and coming to the Pauranic times we
come across the names of various Goddesses such as Devi,
Uma, Sati, Ambika, Parvati, Haimavati, Gauri, Kali, Nirriti, Chandi and Katyayini, Durga, Dassbhuja. Singhavahini,
Mahishasuramardini, Jagaddhatri, Muktakesi, Tara,
Chinnamustaka, Jagadgauri,
Pratyangira, Annapurna, Ganeshjanani, Krishnakrora and Lakshmi. It is very difficult to construct a who is who of these Goddesses. In the first place
it is difficult to say whether each name stands for a distinct and separate Goddess or
they are the names of one Goddess. It is equally difficult to be sure of their parentage.
Nor can any one say with certainty as to who their husbands are.
According to one account Vma, Devi, Sati, Parvati, Gauri and Ambika are different names of the same Goddess.
On the other hand Devi is said by some to be the
daughter of Daksha, Ambika to be the sister of
Rudra. Regarding Parvati the Varaha Purana in
describing her. origin says:
"Brahma when on a visit to Siva on Mount Kailasa is
thus addressed by him: " Say, quickly, 0, Brahma, what has induced you to come to
me?' Brahma replies, 'There is a mighty Asura named Andhaka (Darkness), by whom all the
gods, having been distressed, came for protection, and I have hastened to inform you of
their complaints'. Brahma then looked intently at Siva, who bythought summoned Vishnu into
their presence. As the three deities looked at each other, 'from their three refulgent
glances sprang into being a virgin of celestial loveliness, of hue cerulean, like the
petals of a blue lotus, and adorned with gems, who hashfully bowed before Brahma, Vishnu
and Siva. On their asking her who she was, and why she was distinguished by the three
colours black, white and red, she said, ' From your glances was I produced: do you not
know your own omnipotent energies?' Brahma then praising her said, 'Thou shalt be named
the goddess of three times (past, present and future), the preserver of the universe, and
under various appellations shalt thou be worshipped, as thou shalt be the cause of
accomplishing the desires of thy votaries. But, 0 goddess, divide thyself into three
forms, according to the colours by which thou art distinguished. She then, as Brahma had
requested, divided herself into three parts: one white, one red, and one black. The white
was ' Saraswati of a lovely, felicitious form, and the co-operator with Brahma increation:
the red was Lakshmi, the beloved of Vishnu, who with him preserves the universe; the black
was Parvati endowed with many qualities and energy of Siva. "
Here is an attempt to suggest that Saraswati, Lakshmi and Parvati are different forms of one and the same
divinity. When one remembers that Sarasvati is
the wife of Brahma, Lakshmi is the wife of Vishnu and Parvati is the wife of Shiva, and
also that Brahma. Vishnu and Shiva were at war, this explanation given by the Varah Puran
seems very odd.
Who is Gauri? The Purana says that Gauri is another name for
Parvati. The reason how Parvati was called Gauri is that when Shiva and Parvati lived on mount Kailasa,
occasionally there were quarrels between them, and on one occasion Shiva reproached her
for the blackness of her skin. This taunt so grieved her that she left him for a time.
and, repairing to a deep forest, performed a most severe course of austerities, until
Brahma granted her as a boon that her complexion should be golden and for this
circumstance she is known as Gauri.
Taking the other Goddesses it is not quite certain whether
they are different names for one and the same Goddess or whether they are different
Goddesses. In the Mahabharata there is a hymn sung by Arjuna to Durga in which he says:
"Reverence
be to thee, Siddha-Senani (generalaless of the Siddhas), the noble, the dweller on
Mandara, Kumari (Princess), Kali, Kapali, Kapila, Krishna-pingala. Reverence to thee, Bhadrakali; reverence to thee,
Maha Kali, Chandi, Chanda, Tarini (deliveress), Varavarini (beautiful-coloured). O
fortunate Kalyani, O Karali, O Vijaya, O Jaya (victory)
younger sister of the chief of cowherds (Krishna), delighting always in Mahisha's
blood'. O Uma, Sakambhari, thou white one, thou black one, 0 destroyer of Kaithabha! Of
science, thou art the science of Brahma (or of the Vedas), the great sleep of embodied
beings. 0 mother of Skanda (Kartikeya), divine Durga, dweller in wildernesses'. Thou,
great goddess, art praised with a pure heart. By thy favour let me ever be victorious in
battle."
From this hymn it does appear that some of the Goddesses
listed above are simply different names of Durga. Similarly, Dasabhuja, Singhavahini, Mahishamardini, Jagaddhatri, Chinnamustaka,
Jagadgauri, Pratyangiri, Annapurna are the same as Durga or different forms of Durga.
There are thus two principal Goddesses. One is Parvati and the other is Durga. The rest are mere names. Parvati is the
daughter of Daksha Prajapati and the wife of Shiva and Durga is the sister of Krishna and
the wife of Shiva. The relationship of Durga and
Kali is not quite clear. According to the hymn
sung by Arjuna, Durga and Kali would appear to be one and the same. But the Linga Purana
seems to suggest a different view. According to it. Kali is distinct from Durga.
A comparison between the Vedic Goddesses and the Puranic
Goddesses cannot be avoided by a student whose business it is not merely to write history
but to interpret history. On one point there is a striking contrast, between the two. The
worship of the Vedic Goddesses was worship by courtesy.
They were worshipped only because they were the wives of Gods. The worship of the Puranic
Goddesses stand on a different footing. They claim worship in their own right and not
because they are wives of Gods. This difference arises because the Vedic Goddesses never
went to the battle-field and never performed any heroic deed. The Puranic Goddesses on the
other hand went to the battlefield and performed great heroic deeds. Their worship was not
by courtesy. It was based upon their heroic and thundering deeds.
There was agreat battle, it is said, between Durga and the
two
asuras which brought renown to Durga. The
story is told in the Markandeya Purana in full details. It says
*[f80]:
At
the close of the Treta Age, two giants, named Sumbha and Nishumbha performed religious
austerities for 10,000 years, the merit of which brought Shiva from heaven, who discovered
that by this extraordinary devotion, they sought to obtain the blessing of immortality. He
reasoned long with them, and vainly endeavoured to persuade them to ask for any other
gift. Being denied what they specially wanted, they entered upon still more severe
austerities for another thousand years, when Shiva again appeared, but still refused to
grant what they asked. They now suspended themselves with their heads downwards over a
slow fire, till the blood streamed from their necks; they continued thus for 800 years.
The Gods began to tremble, lest, by performing such rigid act of holiness, these demons
should supplant them on their thrones. The king of the Gods thereupon called a council,
and imparted to them his fears. They admitted that there was ground for anxiety, but asked
what was the remedy.
Acting upon the advice of
Indra, Kandarpa (the God of love), with Rambha and Tilotama, the most beautiful of
the celestial nymphs, were sent to fill the minds of the giants with sensual desires.
Kandarpa with his arrow wounded both; upon which, awaking from their absorption, and
seeing two beautiful women, they were taken in the snare, and abandoned their devotions.
With these women they lived for 5000 years; after which they saw the folly of renouncing
their hopes of immortality for the sake of sensual gratifications. They suspected this
snare must have been a contrivance of Indra; so, driving back the nymphs to heaven, they
renewed their devotions, cutting the flesh off their bones, and making burnt offerings of
it to Shiva. They continued in this way for 1000 years till at last they became mere
skeletons; Shiva again appeared and bestowed upon them his blessing—that in riches
and strength they should excel the Gods.
Being exalted above the Gods, they began to make war upon
them. Aftervarious successes on both sides, the giants became everywhere victorious; when
Indra and the Gods, reduced to a most deplorable state of wretchedness, solicited the
interference of Brahma and Vishnu. They referred them to Shiva, who declared that he could
do nothing for them. When, however, they reminded him that it was through his blessing
they had been ruined, he advised them to perform religious austerities to Durga. They did
so: and after some time the goddess; appeared, and gave them her blessing; then disguising
herself as a common female carrying a pitcher of water, she passed through the assembly of
the gods. She, then assumed her proper form, and said, 'They are celebrating my praise '.
'This new goddess now ascended Mount Himalaya where Chanda
and Manda, two of Sumbha and Nisumbha's messangers resided. As these demons wandered over
the mountain, they saw the goddess; and
being exceedingly struck with her charms, which they described to their masters, advised
them to engage her affections, even if they gave her all the glorious things which they
had obtained in plundering the heavens of the gods.
Sumbha sent Sugriva as messenger to the goddess, to inform
her that the riches of the three worlds were in his palace; that all the offerings which
used to be presented to the gods were now offered to him; and that all these offerings,
riches, etc., would be hers, if she would come to him. The goddess replied that the offer
was very liberal, but that she had resolved that the person she married must first conquer
her in war, and destroy her pride. Sugriva, unwilling, to return unsuccessful, pressed for
a favourable answer, promising that he would conquer her in war, and subdue her pride; and
asked in an authoritative strain; ' Did she know his master, before whom none of the
inhabitants of the worlds had been able to stand, whether gods, demons, or men? How then
could she, a female think of resisting his offers ? If his master had ordered him, he
would have compelled her to go into his presence immediately. She agreed that this was
very correct, but that she had taken her resolution, and exhorted him, therefore to
persuade his master to come and try his strength with her.
The messenger went and related what he had heard. On hearing
his account, Sumbha was filled with rage, and, without making any reply, called for
Dhumlochana his commander-in-chief and gave him orders to go to Himalaya and seize the
goddess and bring her to him. and, if any attempted a rescue, utterly to destroy them.
The commander went to Himalaya, and acquainted the goddess
with his master's orders. She, smiling, invited him to execute them. On the approach of
this hero, she set up a dreadful roar, by which he was reduced to ashes. After which she
destroyed the army of the giant leaving only a few fugitives to communicate the tidings.
Sumbha and Nisumbha, infuriated, sent Chanda and Manda, who on ascending the mountain,
perceived afemale sitting on an ass, laughing. On seeing them she became enraged, and drew
to her ten, twenty, or thirty of their army at a time, devouring them like fruit. She next
seized Manda by the hair, cut off his head and holding it over her mouth, drank the blood.
Chanda, on seeing the other commander slain in this manner, himself came to close quarters
with the goddess. But she, mounted on a lion, sprang on him, and, despatching him as she
had done Manda, devoured part of his army, and drank the blood of the slain.
The giants no sooner heard this alarming news than they
resolved to go themselves, and collecting their forces, an infinite number of giants,
marched to Himalaya. The gods looked down with astonishment on this vast army, and the
goddesses descended to help Maharnaya (Durga), who, however, soon destroyed her foes,
Raktavija, the
principal commander under Sumbha and Nishumbha, seeing all his men destroyed
encountered the goddess in person. But though she covered him with wounds, from every drop
of blood which fell to the ground a thousand giants, arose equal in strength to Raktavija
himself. Hence innumerable enemies surrounded Durga, and the gods were filled with alarm
at the amazing sight. At length Chandi, a goddess, who had assisted Kali (Durga) in the
engagement, promised that if she would drink the giant's blood before it fell to the
ground, she (Chandi) would engage him and destroy the whole of his strangely formed
offspring. Kali consented, and the commander and his army were soon despatched.
Sumbha and Nishumbha, in a state of desperation, next
engaged the goddess in single combat, Sumbha making the first onset. The battle was
inconceivably dreadful on both sides, till at last both the giants were slain, and Kali
sat down to feed on the carnage she had made. The gods and the goddesses chanted the
praises of the celestial heroine, who in return bestowed a blessing on each." The
Markandeya Purana also gives a short account of the valorous deeds of Durga done in the
various forms it took. It says:
" As Durga she received the message of the giants; As
Dasabhuja (the ten-armed) she slew part of their army; As Singhavahini (seated on a lion)
she fought with Raktavija; As Mahishamardini (destroyer of a buffalo) she slew Sumbha in
the form of a buffalo; As Jagaddhatri (the mother of the world) she overcame the army of
the giants; As Kali (the black woman) she slew Raktavija; As Muktakesi (with flowing hair) she overcame
another of the armies of the giants; As Tara (the saviour) she slew Sumbha in his own
proper shape; As Chinnamastaka (the headless) she killed Nisumbha; As Jagadgauri (the
golden-coloured lady renowned through the world) she received the praises and thanks of
the gods." A comparison between the Vedic and Puranic Goddesses raises some
interesting questions. One of them is quite obvious. Vedic literature is full of
references to wars against the Asuras. The literature known as Brahmanas replete with
them. But all these wars against the Asuras are fought by the Vedic Gods. The Vedic
Goddesses never took part in them. With the Puranic Goddesses the situation has undergone
a complete change. In the Puranic times there are wars with the Asuras as there were in
the Vedic times. The difference is that while in the Vedic times the wars with the Asuras
are left to be fought by the Gods in the Puranic times they are left to be fought by the
Goddess. Why is
that Puranic Goddesses had to do what the Gods in Vedic
times did? It cannot be that there were no Gods in Puranic times. There were Brahma,
Vishnu and Shiva gods who ruled in the Puranic times. When they were there to fight the
Asuras why were the Goddesses enrolled for this purpose. This is a riddle which requires
explanation.
The second question is what is the source of this power
which the Puranic Goddesses possessed and which the Vedic Goddesses never had? The answer
given by the Puranic writers is that this power was the power of the Gods which dwelt in
the Goddesses. The general theory was that every God had energy or power which was
technically called Sakti and that the Sakti of every God resided in his wife the Goddess.
This had become such an accepted doctrine that every goddess is called a Sakti and those who worship the Goddess only are
called Saktas.
With regard to this doctrine there are one or. two questions
that call for a reply.
First is this. We may now take it that notwithstanding the
many names of the Goddesses as we find in the Puranas we have really five Puranic
Goddesses before us—namely, Sarasvati,
Lakshmi, Parvati, Durga and Kali.
Sarasvati and Lakshmi are the wives of Brahma and Vishnu who along with Shiva are
recognized as the Puranic Gods. Parvati, Durga and Kali are the wives of Shiva. Now Sarasvati and Lakshmi
have killed no Asura and have in fact done no deed of valour. Question is why? Brahma and
Vishnu had Sakti which in conformity with the
theory must have dwelt in their wives. Why then did Sarasvati and Lakshmi not take part in the battle with the
Asuras? This part is only reserved for the wives of Shiva. Even here Parvati's role is
quite different from that of Durga. Parvati is represented as a simple woman. She has no
heroic deeds to her credit like the ones claimed for Durga. Like Durga, Parvati is also
the Sakti of Shiva. Why was Shiva's Sakti dwelling in Parvati so dull, so dormant, and so
inactive as to be non-existent ?
The second point is that though this doctrine may be a good
justification for starting the worship of Goddesses independently of Gods, it is difficult
to accept either the logical or historical basis of the doctrine. Looking at it purely
from the point of view of logic if every God has Sakti
then even the Vedic Gods must have had it. Why then was this doctrine not applied to the
wives of the Vedic Gods? Looking at it from the point of view of history, there is no
justification for saying that the Puranic Gods had Sakti
in them.
Further the Brahmins do not seem to have realized that by
making Durga the heroine who alone was capable of destroying the Asuras,
they were making their own Gods a set of miserable cowards.
It seems that the Gods could not defend themselves against the Asuras and had to beg of
their wives to come to their rescue. One illustration from the Markandeya Purana is enough
to prove how imbecile the Puranic Gods were shown by the Brahmins against the Asuras. Says
the Markandeya Purana.:
"Mahisha, king of the giants at one time overcame the gods in war. and reduced
them to such a state of want that they wandered through the earth as beggars. Indra first
conducted them to Brahma, and then to Siva; but as these gods could render no assistance,
they turned to Vishnu, who was so grieved at the sight of their wretchedness, that streams
of glory issued from his face. whence came a female figure named Mahamaya (another name of
Durga). Streams of glory issued from the faces of the other gods also. which in like
manner entered Mahamaya: in consequence of which she became a body of glory, like a
mountain of fire. The gods then handed their weapons to this dreadful being, who with a
frightful scream ascended into the air, slew the giant and gave redress to the gods."
How can such cowardly Gods have any prowess? If they had
none, how can they give it to their wives. To say that Goddesses must be worshipped
because they have Sakti is not merely a riddle
but an absurdity. It requires explanation why this doctrine of Sakti was invented. Was it
to put it a new commodity on the market that the Brahmins started the worship of the
Goddesses and degraded the Gods?.
