This
essay consists of II typed foolscap pages tagged into a file. From the last sentence it
appears that the Chapter is incomplete. —Editors
Buddhism
was a revolution. It was as great a Revolution as the French Revolution. Though it began
as a Religious revolution, it became more than Religious revolution. It became a Social
and Political Revolution. To be able to realise how profound was the character of this
Revolution, it is necessary to know the state of the society before the revolution began
its course. To use the language of the French Revolution, it is necessary to have a
picture of the ancient regime in India.
To
understand the great reform, which he brought about by his teaching, it is necessary to
have some idea of the degraded condition of the Aryan civilisation at the time when Buddha
started on the mission of his life.
The
Aryan Community of his time was steeped in the worst kind of debauchery; social, religious
and spiritual.
To
mention only a few of the social evils, attention may be drawn to gambling. Gambling had
become as widespread among the Aryans as drinking.
Every king had a hall of gambling attached to his palace. Every king had an
expert gambler in his employment as a companion to play with. King Virat had in his
employment Kank
as an expert gambler. Gambling was not merely a pastime with kings. They played with heavy
stakes. They staked kingdoms, dependants, relatives, slaves, servants.*[f1]
King Nala staked everything in gambling with Paskkar and lost
everything. The only thing he did not stake was himself and his wife Damayanti. Nala had to go and
live in the forest as a beggar. There were kings who went beyond Nala. The Mahabharat[f2]
tells how Dharma the eldest of the Pandavas gambled and staked everything, his brothers and also
his and their wife Draupadi. Gambling was a matter of honour
with the Aryans and any invitation to gamble was regarded as
an injury to one's honour and dignity. Dharma gambled with such disastrous consequences
although he was warned beforehand. His excuse was that he was invited to gamble and that
as a man of honour, he could not decline such an invitation.
This
vice of gambling was not confined to kings. It had infected even the common folk. Rig-Veda
contains lamentations of a poor Aryan ruined by gambling. The habit of gambling had become
so common in Kautilya's time that there were gambling houses
licensed by the king from which the king derived considerable revenue.
Drinking
was another evil which was rampant among the Aryans. Liquors were of two sorts Soma and Sura. Soma was a
sacrificial wine. The drinking of the Soma was in the beginning permitted only to
Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas.
Subsequently it was permitted only to Brahmins and Kshatriyas. The Vaishyas were excluded
from it and the Shudras were never permitted to taste it.
Its manufacture was a secret known only to the Brahmins. Sura was open to all and was drunk by all. The
Brahmins also drank Sura. Shukracharya the priest to the Asuras drank so heavily that in his drunken state
he gave the life giving Mantra
known to him only and with which he used to revive the Asuras killed by the Devas—to
Katch the son of Brahaspati who was the priest of
the Devas. The Mahabharat mentions an occasion when both
Krishna and Arjuna were dead drunk. That shows that the best
among the Aryan Society were not only not free from the drink habit but that they drank
heavily. The most shameful part of it was that even the Aryan women were addicted to
drink. For instance Sudeshna[f3]
the wife of King Virat tells her maid Sairandhri to go to Kichaka's palace and
bring Sura as she was dying to have a drink. It is not to be supposed that only queens
indulged in drinking. The habit of drinking was common among women of all classes and even
Brahmin women were not free from it. That liquor and dancing was indulged in by the Aryan
women is clear from the Kausitaki
Grihya Sutra 1. 11-12, which says ; "Four or eight women who
are not widowed, after having been regaled with wine and food are to dance for four times
on the night previous to the wedding ceremony."
That
the drinking of intoxicating liquor was indulged in by Brahmin women, not to speak of
women of the lower Varnas, as late as
the seventh and eighth centuries A.D. in the Central region
of Aryavarta, is clear from Kumarila
Bhatta's Tantra-Vartika I (iii).
4, which states, "Among the people of modern days we
find the Brahmin women of the countries of Ahicchatra and Mathura to be addicted to drinking".
Kumarila condemned the practice in the case of Brahmins only, but not of Kshatriyas and Vaishyas men and
women, if the liquor was distilled from fruits or flowers (Madhavi),
and Molasses (Gaudi) and not from grains (Sura).
The
sexual immorality of the Aryan Society must shock their present day descendants. The
Aryans of pre-Buddhist days had no such rule of prohibited
degrees as we have today to govern their sexual or matrimonial relationship.
According
to the Aryan Mythology, Brahma is the creator. Brahma had three sons and a daughter. His
one son Daksha married his sister. The daughters born of
this marriage between brother and sister were married some to Kashyapa
the son of Marichi the son of Brahma and some to Dharma the third son of Brahma.[f4]
In
the Rig-Veda there is an episode related of Yama and Yami brother and sister. According to this episode Yami the
sister invites her brother Yama to cohabit with her and becomes angry when he refuses to
do so.[f5]
A
father could marry his daughter. Vashishta married his own daughter Shatrupa when she
came of age. [f6]Manu married his daughter IIa.[f7]
Janhu
married his daughter Janhavi.[f8]
Surya
married his daughter Usha.[f9]
There
was polyandry not of the ordinary type. The polyandry prevalent
among the Aryans was a polyandry when kinsmen cohabited with one woman. Dhahaprachetani and his son Soma
cohabited with Marisha the daughter of Soma.[f10]
Instances
of grandfather marrying his granddaughter are not wanting. Daksha gave his daughter in
marriage to his father Brahma[f11]
and from that marriage was born the famous Narada. Dauhitra gave his 27 daughters to his father Soma for
cohabitation and procreation. [f12]The
Aryans did not mind cohabiting with women in the open and
within sight of people. The Rishis used to perform certain
religious rites which were called Vamdevya vrata. These rites
used to be performed on the Yadnya bhumi. If any woman
came there and expressed a desire for sexual intercourse and asked the sage to satisfy
her, the sage used to cohabit with her then and there in the open on the Yadnya bhumi. Instances of this may be mentioned.
The case of the sage Parashara had sexual intercourse with Satyavati and also of Dirghatapa.
That such a custom was common is shown by the existence of the word Ayoni. The word Ayoni is
understood to mean of immaculate conception. That is not however the original meaning of
the word. The original meaning of the word Yoni is house.
Ayoni means conceived out of the house i.e. in the open. That there was nothing deemed to
be wrong in this is clear from the fact that both Sita and Draupadi were Ayonija. That this
was very common is clear from the fact that religious injunctions had to be issued against
such a practice[f13]
There
was prevalent among the Aryans the practice of renting out their women to others for a
time. As an illustration may be mentioned the story of Madhavi.[f14]
The king Yayati
gave his daughter Madhavi
as an offering to his Guru Galav. Galav rented out the girl Madhavi to three kings, each a period. Thereafter
he gave her in marriage to Vishwamitra.
She remained with him until a son was born to her. Thereafter Galav took away the girl and gave her back to her
father Yayati.
Besides
the practice of letting out women to others temporarily at a rent there was prevalent
among the Aryans another practice namely allowing procreation by the best amongst them.
Raising a family was treated by them as though it was a breeding or stock raising. Among
the Aryas there was a class of persons called Devas who were
Aryans but of a superior status and prowess. The Aryans allowed their women to have sexual
intercourse with any one of the class of Devas in the interest of good breeding. This
practice prevailed so extensively that the Devas came to regard pre libation in respect of
the Aryan Women as their prescriptive right. No Aryan woman could be married unless this
right of pre-libation had been redeemed and the woman released from the control of the
Devas by offering what was technically called Avadan. The Laja Hoame which is performed in every Hindu marriage and the details of which are given in the Ashwalayan Grahya Sutra is a
relic of this act of the redemption of the Aryan woman from the right of pre-libation of
the Devas. The Avadan in the Laja Hoama is
nothing but the price for the extinguishing of the right of the Devas over the bride. The Saptapadi performed
in all Hindu marriages and which is regarded as the most essential ceremony without which
there is no lawful marriage has an integral connection with this right of pre-libation of
the Devas. Saptapadi means walking by the bridegroom seven
steps with the bride. Why is this essential? The answer is that the Devas, if they were dissatisfied with the compensation, could claim
the woman before the seventh step was taken. After the seventh step was taken, the right
of the Devas was extinguished and the bridegroom could take away the bride and live as
husband and wife without being obstructed or molested by the Devas.```
There
was no rule of chastity for maidens. A girl could have sexual intercourse with and also
progeny from anybody without contracting marriage. This is evident from the root meaning
of the word Kanya which
means a girl. Kanya comes from the root Kam which means a girl free to offer herself to
any man. That they did offer themselves to any man and had children without contracting
regular marriage is illustrated by the case of Kunti and Matsyagandha. Kunti had children
from different men before she was married to Pandu and Matsyagandha
had sexual intercourse with the sage Parashara before she married to Shantanu the father
of Bhishma.
Bestiality
was also prevalent among the Aryans. The story of the sage Dam having sexual intercourse
with a female dear, is well known. Another instance is that of Surya
cohabiting with a mare. But the most hideous instance is that of the woman having sexual
intercourse with the horse in the Ashvamedha Yadna.
(INCOMPLETE)
No comments:
Post a Comment